While watching Hound of Baskervilles, the
character relationship remains the same, but the story and personalities are
different. These changes needed to be made in order to appeal to a 21st
century audience. The dynamic between Holmes and Watson remained the same.
Holmes, carrying the majority of the weight while Watson is the one doing the interviewing
and is the guinea pig. In the 21st century, Holmes is quite a bit
more eccentric. The way he recalls and processes information could be viewed as
a mental disorder in the 21st century, as opposed to just
quirkiness. Watson has also changed in the 21st century. In Doyle’s
“The Hound of the Baskervilles”, Watson seems very timid and only faces his
fears because he wants to please Holmes. In the 21st century however,
he is more outspoken when addressing Holmes. Ultimately, he is a stronger
character, not just an extension of Holmes. It is interesting to see his
transformation. Most surprisingly, is that he was the one who ended up shooting
the “hound”, when in the original novel, it is Holmes that shoots.
The
storyline needed revamped in the 21st century. Some giant dog,
reeking havoc on a family does not have the same frightening affect it once did.
By changing the hound into a genetic experiment and ultimately into a
hallucinatory drug, this definitely appeals to the 21st century
audience. Genetic experiments and drugs are more prevalent now than they ever
have been. Also, the setting has changed. The updated modern home instead of
the castle, and the Moor being a minefield instead of a marsh. The minefield evokes
a frightening feeling because this movie’s main audience is the British and the
World War II bomb droppings the U.K experienced. All in all, this movie
reflects the 21st century definition of the gothic because it
incorporates aspects we hear and see every day.
Monday, April 15, 2013
Monday, April 8, 2013
The Dynamic Duo of Holmes and Watson
When facing fear, Holmes and Watson are total
opposite. This is to be expected though based upon the characters personality. Holmes
is clever, confident and certain in his abilities. Watson on the other hand, is
unsure of himself, spending a lot of time making notes, and never fully
believes in himself and needs Holmes to step in and take control or reassure
him that he is right. Holmes faces his fears head on, a prime example of this
being him shooting the hound at the end. Watson, being shaky and unsure, does
not have this immediate reaction, an example of this being at the end of
chapter 11/ beginning of chapter 12, when it describes how scarred Watson is. Also, how nervous Holmes becomes when he learns that he will be sent to the Baskerville's home, without Holmes coming along. Their contrasting personalities is what makes the book entertaining to read.
Monday, April 1, 2013
The Spin of Latin America
Latin American gothic contains the
same classic troupes, common in all cultural variations of the genre; decay,
hidden identity, oppression, isolation and transgressed love, just to name a
few. As we continue to explore new cultural areas of gothic literature these
same troupes are continuous but with their own little “spin”. The “spin” in
Latin American gothic is magical realism. Magical realism turns aspects that
are familiar into dream like, and things that are not familiar become something
that we understand. The story in “The Gospel of Mark” is very familiar, but it
was unexpected for the teachings to end up being taken so literally. “If you
Touched my Heart” was vaguely familiar with the transgressed love in the
beginning but as the story progressed, it became more horrific and unimaginable.
Torture was present throughout the story, but not the same type of torture we
had previously experienced. This type of torture was some physical torture, but
more mental torture that only the characters would understand (although, Amadeo
does not really recall why the psaltery is so painful for him). In “A Very Old
Man With Enormous Wings” we see the familiar, mundane life of Pelayo and
Elisenda’s combined with a dream like world of flying and a spider woman.
While studying these three stories,
the motivation for them shows through. Borges views on the how literally
religion is taken shines through in “The Gospel of Mark”. We learned how to war
and long-term suffering of Chile is present in Allende’s “If You Touched My
Heart.” Márquez’s “A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings” is a tale of how
compassion is hard to come by, and how sometimes things do not need to be
identified in order to be. It seems that each cultural area has its own
motivation which is what influences the “spin” that was previously mentioned.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)